Preview

South Russian Journal of Therapeutic Practice

Advanced search

Comparative antihypertensive efficacy of combinations of azilsartan medoxomil or olmesartan medoxomil with amlodipine in patients with arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

https://doi.org/10.21886/2712-8156-2023-4-1-68-74

Abstract

Оbjective: to compare the effectiveness of the effect of two combination therapy options on office blood pressure (BP), 24-hour blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and 24-hour BP profile (DAP) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Materials and methods: 137 patients with uncontrolled hypertension combined with DM2 and NAFLD were examined. After randomization by the "envelope" method, patients of the 1st group were assigned a combination of azilsartan medoxomil (Az-M) with amlodipine (Aml), the 2nd group a combination of olmesartan medoxomil (Ol-M) with Aml. At baseline, at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks, office BP was measured, and ABPM and DAP were analyzed at baseline and at 24 weeks of the study. Resultsafter 12 weeks in the 1st and 2nd groups, 86,8% and 84,1% of patients, respectively, reached the target level (TA) of blood pressure, which was maintained until the end of the study. After 24 weeks, both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in ABPM parameters and optimization of DAP. At the same time, taking the Ol-M/Aml combination was accompanied by more pronounced positive dynamics of some prognostically important ABPM indicators. Conclusiondespite the significant antihypertensive effect on the background of the use of both combinations, the effect on individual parameters of ABPM Ol-M/Aml was more pronounced.

About the Authors

I. А. Lukonin
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ilya A. Lukonin, the assistant to chair of Hospital Therapy

Krasnodar



V. V. Skibitsky
Kuban State Medical University

Vitaly V. Skibitsky, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of department of Hospital Therapy

Krasnodar



A. V. Fendrikova
Kuban State Medical University

Aleksandra V. Fendrikova, the associate professor of Hospital Therapy

Krasnodar



A. V. Skibitsky
Kuban State Medical University

Aleksander V. Skibitsky, the associate professor of Hospital Therapy

Krasnodar



I. A. Antipov
Kuban State Medical University

Ivan A. Antipov, the student

Krasnodar



References

1. Petrie JR, Guzik TJ, Touyz RM. Diabetes, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical Insights and Vascular Mechanisms. Can J Cardiol. 2018 May;34(5):575-584. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.005.

2. Kim KS, Lee BW, Kim YJ, Lee DH, Cha BS, Park CY. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Diabetes: Part II: Treatment. Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Apr;43(2):127-143. DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2019.0034/

3. Kasper P, Martin A, Lang S, Kütting F, Goeser T, Demir M, Steffen HM. NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases: a clinical review. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Jul;110(7):921-937. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-020-01709-7. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

4. Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Juraschek SP, Solomon SD. Assessment of Long-term Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Residual Life Span: Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):576-581. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6192.

5. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M et al. 2018 Practice Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension and the European Society of Cardiology: ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018 Dec;36(12):2284-2309. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001961.

6. Кобалава Ж.Д., Конради А.О., Недогода С.В., Шляхто Е.В., Арутюнов Г.П., Баранова Е.И., и др. Артериальная гипертензия у взрослых. Клинические рекомендации 2020. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2020;25(3):3786. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3-3786.

7. Скибицкий В.В., Фендрикова А.В., Сиротенко Д.В., Скибицкий А.В. Хронотерапевтические аспекты эффективности азилсартана медоксомила в составе комбинированной терапии у пациентов с артериальной гипертонией и метаболическим синдромом. Кардиология. 2016;56(10):35-40. DOI: 10.18565/cardio.2016.10.35-40.

8. Redon J, Weber MA, Reimitz PE, Wang JG. Comparative effectiveness of an angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan medoxomil, in older hypertensive patients. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Feb;20(2):356-365. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13183.

9. Маевская М.В., Котовская Ю.В., Ивашкин В.Т., Ткачева О.Н., Трошина Е.А., Шестакова М.В. и др. Национальный Консенсус для врачей по ведению взрослых пациентов с неалкогольной жировой болезнью печени и ее основными коморбидными состояниями. Терапевтический архив.2022;94(2):216–253. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2022.02.201363.

10. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом / Под редакцией И.И. Дедова, М.В. Шестаковой, А.Ю. Майорова. – 9-й выпуск (дополненный). – М.; 2019. DOI: 10.14341/DM221S1.

11. Tarikuz Zaman A, McLean D, Sobel B. The efficacy and tolerability of azilsartan in obese insulin-resistant mice with left ventricular pressure overload. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2013; 62 (4): 381-7.

12. Iwai M, Chen R, Imura Y, Horiuchi M. TAK-536, a new AT1 receptor blocker, improves glucose intolerance and adipocyte differentiation. Am J Hypertens. 2007 May;20(5):579-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.12.010.

13. Georgiopoulos G, Katsi V, Oikonomou D, et al. Azilsartan as a potent antihypertensive drug with possible pleiotropic cardiometabolic effects: a review study. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:235-9. DOI:10.3389/fphar.2016.00235.

14. Троицкая Е.А., Старостина Е.С., Кобалава Ж.Д. Эффективность азилсартана медоксомила в отношении суточного профиля периферического и центрального артериального давления и артериальной ригидности у пациентов с артериальной гипертонией и сахарным диабетом 2 типа. Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика. 2017;16(1):74-81. DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2017-1-74-81.

15. Скибицкий В. В., Фендрикова А. В., Сиротенко Д. В., Скибицкий А. В. Хронотерапевтические аспекты эффективности азилсартана медоксомила в составе комбинированной терапии у пациентов с артериальной гипертонией и метаболическим синдромом. Кардиология. 2016;56(10):35-40. DOI: 10.18565/cardio.2016.10.35-40.

16. Луконин И.А., Скибицкий В.В., Фендрикова А.В., Павлюченко И.И., Лазарев К.Ю., Коваленко Ф.А. Эффективность комбинированной антигипертензивной фармакотерапии у пациентов с артериальной гипертонией, сочетанной с сахарным диабетом 2 типа и неалкогольной жировой болезнью печени. Системные гипертензии. 2022;19(1):31-38. https://doi.org/10.38109/2075-082X-2022-1-31-38.

17. Furuhashi M, Moniwa N, Mita T, Fuseya T, Ishimura S, Ohno K et al. Urinary angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in hypertensive patients may be increased by olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker. Am J Hypertens. 2015 Jan;28(1):15-21. DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpu086.

18. Agata J, Ura N, Yoshida H, Shinshi Y, Sasaki H, Hyakkoku M et al. Olmesartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker with an inhibitory effect on angiotensin-converting enzyme. Hypertens Res. 2006 Nov;29(11):865-74. DOI: 10.1291/hypres.29.865.

19. Kiya Y, Miura S, Fujino M, Imaizumi S, Karnik SS, Saku K. Clinical and pharmacotherapeutic relevance of the double-chain domain of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker olmesartan. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010 Jan;32(2):129-36. DOI: 10.3109/10641960903254430.

20. Bakris GL, Sica D, Weber M, White WB, Roberts A, Perez A et al. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Feb;13(2):81-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00425.x.

21. White WB, Weber MA, Sica D, Bakris GL, Perez A, Cao C et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):413-20. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402.

22. Sezai A, Osaka S, Yaoita H, Arimoto M, Hata H, Shiono M et al. Changeover Trial of Azilsartan and Olmesartan Comparing Effects on the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Patients with Essential Hypertension after Cardiac Surgery (CHAOS Study). Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jun 20;22(3):161-7. DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00054.

23. Shiga Y, Miura SI, Motozato K, Norimatsu K, Yano M, Hitaka Y et al. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan and Olmesartan in Patients With Essential Hypertension. Int Heart J. 2017 May 31;58(3):416-421. DOI: 10.1536/ihj.16-285.

24. Свидетельство о государственной регистрации базы данных № 2022623028 Российская Федерация. База данных исходов лечения больных артериальной гипертонией, сочетанной с Е11 и К76.0, в зависимости от полиморфизмов гена CYP2C9 : № 2022622909 : заявл. 10.11.2022 : опубл. 22.11.2022 / И. А. Луконин, И. А. Антипов, В. В. Скибицкий. – EDN YJMSWW


Review

For citations:


Lukonin I.А., Skibitsky V.V., Fendrikova A.V., Skibitsky A.V., Antipov I.A. Comparative antihypertensive efficacy of combinations of azilsartan medoxomil or olmesartan medoxomil with amlodipine in patients with arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. South Russian Journal of Therapeutic Practice. 2023;4(1):68-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2712-8156-2023-4-1-68-74

Views: 2720


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-8156 (Print)