Preview

South Russian Journal of Therapeutic Practice

Advanced search

Comparative assessment of adherence in pregnant and non-pregnant women of reproductive age

https://doi.org/10.21886/2712-8156-2024-5-4-99-110

Abstract

Objective: to conduct a comparative assessment of adherence to the treatment of pregnant and non-pregnant reproductive age.

Material and methods: 115 women (60 pregnant and 55 non-pregnant) of reproductive age from 18 to 49 years old were examined. All patients completed an online electronic questionnaire of quantitative adherence to treatment with further automatic calculation of results and issuance of a conclusion. The prognosis of adherence to lifestyle modification (LSM), adherence to medical support (MS), adherence to drug therapy (DT), total adherence to treatment (TAT) was assessed depending on age, education, labor status, bad habits, the number of births, the presence of hypertension (AH), obesity, extragenital pathology. Adherence was assessed as low in terms of < 50%, mean 50–75%, and high > 75%.

Results: adherence to LSM in pregnant women corresponded to a mean level, and non-pregnant to a low level. Low adherence to LSM was found in 33.3% of pregnant and 58.2% of non-pregnant women. TAT values in both groups were in the range of mean adherence, but were higher in pregnant women. In the structure of TAT in pregnant women, unlike non-pregnant women, there was a lower level (21.7% versus 38.2%) and more often a high level (28.3% versus 10.9%). The adherence values of MS and DT and the level distribution did not differ between the groups. In the pregnant group, patients with secondary education and who did not drink alcohol demonstrated a high level of adherence to MS. In the non-pregnant group, only DT adheres to women with secondary education and no smoking were committed compared to smokers and patients with higher education.

Conclusion: the current method of determining adherence to treatment is the electronic questionnaire. Adherence to LSM and TAT was significantly higher in pregnant women and corresponded to the mean level, adherence rates to MS and DT did not differ between groups and were also at the mean level. In all examined women, there was no relationship between adherence to LSM, TAT, MS, DT and the studied de facto frames: age, number of births, labor status, presence of AH, obesity. More committed to treatment were pregnant and non-pregnant women with secondary education and no “bad” habits.

About the Authors

E. A. Kudryashov
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Evgeny A. Kudryashov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), the associate professor of Department of Hospital Therapy

Krasnodar



T. B. Zabolotskikh
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Tatyana B. Zabolotskikh, Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor of the Department of Hospital Therapy

Krasnodar



V. V. Skibitsky
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Vitaly V. Skibitsky, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, Head of department of Hospital Therapy

Krasnodar



K. S. Sukhomlinova
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ksenia S. Sukhomlinova, 6th year student

Krasnodar



P. S. Gopkalo
Kuban State Medical University
Russian Federation

Pavel S. Gopkalo, 6th year student

Krasnodar



Yu. A. Kudryashova
Kuban State University of Physical Education, Sports and Tourism
Russian Federation

Yulia A. Kudryashova, Cand. Sci. (Bio.), associate professor of the Anatomy and Sports Medicine Departmen

Krasnodar



References

1. Ageev F.T., Fofanova T.V., Smirnova M.D. Metody ocenki, kontrolya i povysheniya priverzhen-nosti terapii. Serdechnaya Nedostatochnost’. 2013;14(7):380-381. (in Russ.).

2. Tarlovskaya E.I., Omarova Y.V. Assessment of adherence to therapy and options for polyphar-macy in patients with CHF according to local registry data. South Russian Journal of Therapeutic Practice. 2024;5(2):58-63. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21886/2712-8156-2024-5-2-58-63

3. Levine DA, Morgenstern LB, Langa KM, Piette JD, Rogers MA, Karve SJ. Recent trends in cost-related medication nonadherence among stroke survivors in the United States. Ann Neurol. 2013;73(2):180-188. DOI: 10.1002/ana.23823

4. Pastbina I.M., Ignatova O.A., Kharkiv O.A., Menshikova L.I., Chumakova G.N. Effect of to-bacco smoking and the level of education of women on the duration of breastfeeding of chil-dren. Issues of pediatric dietetics. 2015;13(1):58–56 (in Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 23398523 EDN: TSATZX

5. Ignatko I.V., Shchepetkova G.S., Miryushchenko M.M. Risk factors for complications of perina-tal pathology in overweight and obese pregnant women. Gynecology, obstetrics and perinatology. 2014;13(3):13–18. (in Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 21892254 EDN: QPEEXX

6. Hohlov A.L., Lisenkova L.A., Rakov A.A. Analiz faktorov, opredelyayushchih priverzhennost’ k an-tigipertenzivnoj terapii. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika. 2003;(4):59–66. (in Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 25281057 EDN: VHFWDL

7. Tarasenko E.V., Naumova E.A., SHvarc YU.G. Priverzhennost’ k dlitel’nomu lecheniyu i faktory na nee vliyayushchie. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2007;(9):57–58.(in Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 12956141 EDN: KXNMXD

8. World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, Geneva, WHO 2003;211.

9. Lukina Yu.V., Kutishenko N.P., Martsevich S.Yu., Drapkina O.M. Questionnaires and scores for assessing medication adherence — advantages and disadvantages of the diagnostic method in research and actual clinical practice. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2020;19(3):2562. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2020-2562

10. Nikolaev N.A., Martynov A.I., Bojcov S.A., Drapkina O.M., Sychev D.A., Livzan M.A., et al. The first Russian consensus on quantitative assessment of treatment outcome. Medical news of North Caucasus. 2019;2(14):283-301. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.14300/mnnc.2019.14072

11. Nikolayev N.A., Skirdenko U.P., Zherebilov V.V. Quantitative assessment of adherence to treatment in clinical medicine: protocol, procedure, interpretation. Good clinical practice. 2016;(1):50-59. (in Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 26375081 EDN: WFEHXX

12. Nikolayev N.A., Skirdenko Yu.P.. Russian generic questionnaire for evaluation of compliance to drug therapy. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018,27(1):74-78. (in Russ.) eLIBRARY ID: 32768906 EDN: YVJSKV

13. Nikolaev N.A., Skirdenko Yu.P., Balabanova A.A., Gorbenko A.V., Andreev K.A., Fedorin M.M., Livzan M.A., Chebanenko E.V., Usov G.M. The Scale of Quantitative Assessment Ad-herence to Treatment «QAA-25»: Updating of Formulations, Constructive and Factor Validity and a Measure of Consent. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2021;17(6):845-852. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.20996/1819-6446-2021-12-12

14. ZHusupova Z.K., Zeynalova D.E., Kruykova A.Y. Main determinant of addition to treatment of arte-rial hypertension in pregnant women as prevention of ancient complications. Vestnik so-veta molodyh uchyonyh i specialistov CHelyabinskoj oblasti. 2020;1(1):17-21. (In Russ.).

15. Mitrofanova I.S., Stolbova M.V., Sharapov S.V., Morina A. Adherence to treatment of pregnant women with arterial hypertension. National Association of Scientists. 2015;4(9):79-81. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 28922791 EDN: VXQGTI

16. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

17. Kozina E.A., Pavlov O.G., Tomareva E.I. Medical and social aspects of prenatal diagnostics. Herald of New Medical Technologies. 2016;(2):2-17. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/20075.

18. Malyshkina A.I., Nazarova A.O., Batrak N.V., Zholobov Yu.N., Kozyrina A.A., Kulieva E.Yu., et al. Medical and social characteristics of pregnant women in Ivanovo. Russian Bulletin of Ob-stetrician-Gynecologist. 2014;14(4):9-12 (In Russ.).

19. Dietz PM, England LJ, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Tong VT, Farr SL, Callaghan WM. Infant morbidity and mortality attributable to prenatal smoking in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(1):45-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.009

20. Committee opinion no. 496: At-risk drinking and alcohol dependence: obstetric and gyneco-logic implications. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):383-388. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822c9906

21. Williams JF, Smith VC, Committee on substance abuse. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders. Pediatrics. 2015;136(5):e1395-406. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3113

22. Yepifanova A.K., Surmach M.Yu. Manageable factors of health related quality of women’s life during pregnancy. Healthcare. 2019;(11):11-16 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 42352183 EDN: NWVFOQ

23. Balanova Yu.A., Shalnova S.A., Imaeva A.E., Kapustina А.V., Muromtseva G.A., Evstifeeva S.V., et al. Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment and Control of Hypertension in Russian Federa-tion (Data of Observational ESSE-RF-2 Study). Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology. 2019;15(4):450-466. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.20996/1819-6446-2019-15-4-450-466

24. The effect of obesity on cognitive function, trevoga and depression in pregnant patients during regional anesthesia. Bulletin of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2023;20(4):27–32. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24884/2078-5658-2022-20-4-27-32.

25. Begimbekova LM., Aliyeva EN., Ospanova AM. Peculiarities of pregnancy and childbirth in women of different age groups. West Kazakhstan Medikal journal. 2022;64(2):73-79. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 49388848 EDN: WUTPGV

26. Dudchenko Z.F. Glushak E.V. Psychological features and characteristics of a healthy life-time (healthy lifestyle) of pregnant women. Scientific notes of SPbGIPSR. 2016;25(1):43-48 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 26688546 EDN: WMAQZJ

27. Tkacheva O.N., Bevz A.Yu., Ushkalova E.A., Chukhareva N.A. The first All-Russian pharmaco-epidemiological study "Epidemiology of the use of medicines in pregnant women": the main re-sults. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;(4):112–117. (In Russ.).


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Kudryashov E.A., Zabolotskikh T.B., Skibitsky V.V., Sukhomlinova K.S., Gopkalo P.S., Kudryashova Yu.A. Comparative assessment of adherence in pregnant and non-pregnant women of reproductive age. South Russian Journal of Therapeutic Practice. 2024;5(4):99-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2712-8156-2024-5-4-99-110

Views: 291


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-8156 (Print)